Today’s decision by the Supreme Court of Canada about defamation law has shifted the balance from plaintiffs to defendants — in other words, towards greater free speech. The court calls it a modernization, which it is — phenomena like talk radio shows, partisan TV panels and the Internet were not around when defamation law was developing (it actually goes back 400 years). It also brings us more in synch with the U.S. approach to free speech, and breaks away from the European model of soft censorship.
In other words, it should terrify Canada’s human rights commissions. (…)
The decision doesn’t end defamation suits, of course. It merely moves the fulcrum a bit, by widening the scope of what constitutes “fair comment”. Fair comment must still be rooted in true facts; but if those facts are clear, and the defamer’s comments are clearly his own views, the court will give latitude to even “outrageous” and “ridiculous” opinions.
The rule of thumb for writers — and bloggers — remains: get your facts straight. But the good news for free speechniks is that, if your facts are accurate, you can be dramatic, critical and even wrong in your opinions. It’s good news for bloggers — and bad news for censors everywhere.
Tune in to Sun News!
Rob Ford tshirts back!
Advertise on this blog!
Reach this blog's 100,000+ unique monthly visitors.
CLICK HERE for ad rates!
NEW from New English Review:
- UK: Assisted suicide could be legal in months as more MPs say they will vote in favour of a law change
- Putin trumps hollow Obama
- UK: Tory welfare minister challenged about the impact of benefits changes on families
- US: Immigrant detainees on hunger strike in Washington state
- Students look to ban Sabra hummus at U. of Ottawa
- Wait ’til my Toronto condo neighbours see the ‘Remington’ box in the recycling…
- Does Jeet Heer think non-whites can’t read, or…?
- Mark Steyn’s new National Review column
- From our bulging ‘Oh, but that’s different!’ file: Whole Foods — America’s Temple of Pseudoscience
- Arguing with a leftist about gun control on Facebook: Illustrated edition
- ‘I mean, I never understood it…’
- Does Dan Hill have a brain tumor now?
- More K-Y for that slippery slope!
- Mark Steyn on Day 2 of the Ezra Levant libel trial
- How silly is Doug Saunders? This silly: