Botox, perhaps? And is the phrase “straight face” homophobic?
Anyway, from, incredibly, the Wall Street Journal:
…can Farber argue with a straight face that an act of vandalism is a hate crime if it’s motivated by disapproval of non-Jews’ dating Jews but not if it’s motivated by disapproval of Jews’ dating non-Jews?
“The shikse incident” makes hate-crime laws look absurd either way.
