“It’s not possible to take a stand against the Canadian Human Rights Commission without also talking a stand against Richard Warman. He has been the plaintiff on half the Section 13 cases in its entire history and on all the Section 13 cases since 2002.
“There are 30 million Canadians yet only one of them uses this law, over and over and over again, which tells you how necessary it is to keeping the Queen’s peace. Section 13 is, in effect, Warman’s Law and the CHRC is Warman’s personal inquisition and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal is Warman’s very own kangaroo court.”
I realize the Richard Warman lawsuit against Canadian bloggers must be somewhat mysterious to those who haven’t read every word we’ve blogged since around January this year.
Our blog posts about “the Anne Cools business” take up much of Warman’s complaint.
So: here is the (as yet unsued) Steyn, in an older post, raising the same questions we did — and frankly, asking even more provocative ones, which is why he makes the big bucks, — questions which are now getting us taken to court:
Read More...
The defendant [in yet another Human Rights complaint, and, as it happens, something of a computer expert] Marc Lemire alleges that on September 5th 2003 the plaintiff Richard Warman, under a pseudonym, posted the following message at Lemire’s Freedom Site:
“Cools don’t belong in our Senate
“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bull**** down our throats. Time to go back to when the women n**ger imports knew their place…And that place was NOT in public!”
