This morning I laid eyes on three young Muslim terrorists.

I’d be happy to give the police a detailed description, but they wouldn’t be interested. In the Magical Land of Upside Down we call “Canada” — which is the ancient Ojibwa word for “kick me” — those three terrorists are victims, you see.

The passengers on United 93 decided they would rather die than allow their plane to be hijacked on September 11, 2001.

I have never been prouder to be a Canadian than the day I heard Ken Whyte say he would rather Maclean’s magazine go bankrupt than allow it to be hijacked by a handful of Muslim beligerents.

At this morning’s press conference, held by the Sharia Creeps, we were promised a big “settlement” announcement in the absurd case of Steyn & Maclean’s v. A Bunch of Sock Puppets and Their Anti-Semite Master Behind the Curtain.

In a dazzling demonstration of both taqiyya AND hudna, we received no such thing. 

The three law students — or rather, their obnoxious lawyer, who did all the talking — simply reiterated their original demands: that Maclean’s magazine honor the students’ imaginary “right to rebuttal” (a right that exists nowhere in English common law or centuries of journalistic and publishing practice) by letting them publish 5,000 unsolicited and unedited words in someone else’s magazine.

Despite the repeated (I lost track at 6) attempts by the National Post’s Joseph Brean to get them to explain what exactly was different about this new and improved “settlement” offer, no clear answer was forthcoming.

Then, after insisting again and again that the case “had nothing to do with Mark Steyn”, the lawyer proceded to read large chunks of Steyn’s “controversial” essay in Maclean’s.  

(KEEP READING...)